Your deal data is confidential. We treat it that way.

Check it. Every finding carries the exact sentence that produced it, who said it and when, so testing one takes seconds rather than a meeting. DealTruth is also built to under-claim: where the evidence does not establish something, it says so instead of guessing. The honest limit is that it only reads what your tools captured. If a commitment was made in a corridor, DealTruth will tell you the deal has no evidence for it rather than invent some.

DealTruth grades deals, not people. There is no talk-time, no activity score, no leaderboard and no score attached to a person anywhere in it. There is nothing for a rep to fill in either. The first person a gap usually helps is the rep, who sees it before a manager asks about it. If what you want is a tool that ranks your team, this is not it.

They answer different questions. Your recorder captures what was said. Your forecasting tools summarise what has been entered. Neither was built to test whether the deal is qualified. That job still lands on a manager reading deals one at a time. DealTruth does that read on every deal, every week. You keep both tools and replace neither.

Your calls, emails, meetings and CRM activity are held on servers in Ireland. To analyse a conversation, the text of it goes to a third-party AI model in the United States. The result returns to that record in Ireland. The diagram on this page shows every hop, including the one that leaves the EU. We would rather show you that hop than let your security team find it.

No, and the part worth pressing is not our answer. DealTruth has no training of any kind, so nothing leaves your deals that way. The harder question is what the company behind the third-party model does with text sent to its API. That is contractual, and no vendor settles it on a web page. Ask us and you get a written answer with the current terms attached, which is what your security team will want on file.

Inside your company: a rep only ever sees deals they own. Not hidden from view, but genuinely unavailable to them, and the database enforces that rather than the menus. Managers and admins see the whole pipeline, and changing what someone can see takes an admin deliberately changing their role. Inside ours: only the people who need it to run and support the service. We name them, the controls on them and what is logged when they do, in writing, before you connect anything.

DealTruth says so, and that is the point. A quiet deal and a healthy one never look the same. Where the evidence does not establish something, the finding is that it is not established, and the deal shows exactly what is missing. It will not fill a gap with an assumption to look more useful than it is.

Connect the tools you already use, then name two deals: one you are confident about and one you are not. There is nothing to migrate, no data to clean up first, no fields to standardise and no rollout. You are judging it on deals you already have an opinion about. That is the fastest way to find out whether it reads them correctly.

Your calls, your CRM and your recordings never stop being yours. They stay in the systems they already live in, and DealTruth reads them rather than replacing them. What you would be leaving is DealTruth, not your deal history. Export and deletion are commitments rather than claims, so they belong in the agreement. You get the full set to review before you connect anything.

Nothing. The first group of partners run it on their own pipeline at no cost. The only demonstration worth anything is the one on deals you already know. What it costs after that is being set with that first group. We will be straight with you about it before you spend time on a trial.